Talk:Blade: Difference between revisions

m
No edit summary
m (moved Talk:Sword to Talk:Blade)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
::::Yes, something definitely has to be done about it. But I don't know, doesn't it seem a little unnecessary to split it up into two pages considering the even more decreased quantity of items that would be in the respective articles? I'd say that a name change would be better, though that's just my personal preference; can't we name it "Blade weapons" or something similar (perhaps more cleverly sounding)? D: ~ [[User:Sun Braid|Sun Braid]] 13:21, 17 February 2011 (MST)
::::Yes, something definitely has to be done about it. But I don't know, doesn't it seem a little unnecessary to split it up into two pages considering the even more decreased quantity of items that would be in the respective articles? I'd say that a name change would be better, though that's just my personal preference; can't we name it "Blade weapons" or something similar (perhaps more cleverly sounding)? D: ~ [[User:Sun Braid|Sun Braid]] 13:21, 17 February 2011 (MST)
:::::I like the sound of "Blades". [[User:Shayminguy7|Shayminguy7]] 14:11, 17 February 2011 (MST)
:::::I like the sound of "Blades". [[User:Shayminguy7|Shayminguy7]] 14:11, 17 February 2011 (MST)
::::::"Blades" also sounds good to me, with 'swords' and 'knives' (and their non-plural equivalents) redirecting. <small>If all else fails, we could have this page at "sharp pointy things". :P</small> {{User:Tina/sig}} 15:09, 17 February 2011 (MST)
Oddball
3,600

edits